Telephone Conversation –
Wole Soyinka
“Telephone Conversation”
by Wole Soyinka, is a poetic satire against the widespread racism, which is still
dominant in the modern western society. As the title suggests, the poem depicts
a telephone conversation between a West African man and a British landlady who
shockingly changes her attitude towards the man soon after he reveals his
racial identity.
In the poem “Telephone
Conversation”, the mode of telephone conversation is employed by the poet to a
broader level where racial bigotry is ridiculed in the context of human
intelligence and portraying the poet’s wit and his ingenious sense of humour.
The poem begins on a
peaceful note, befitting to the narrator’s satisfaction for having found the
right house.
“The price seemed reasonable, location
Indifferent.”
The landlady also
emphatically mentioned that she lived ‘off premises’, thereby ensuring that the
tenant would enjoy absolute privacy and freedom. The conversation however
drifted to an unpleasant turn of events, soon after the man surprisingly
decided to make a self-confession to reveal his nationality.
“Madam,” I Warned,
I hate a wasted journey – I am African.”
A sudden unexpected
silence followed and the awkward pause in the conversation is strengthened by a
caesura, trying to emphasize the impact of the African’s race being revealed to
the landlady. An uneasy atmosphere is
created and the word ‘silenced’ reiterates the sudden change in the landlady’s
attitude as well as the man’s intuitive sensitivity towards the unfriendliness
on the other end of the phone.
“Silence. Silence transmission of
Pressurized good-breeding.”
After considerable period
of silence when the landlady spoke again, her words seemed to come from between
lipstick coated lips that held between them a long gold-rolled cigarette-holder
and impression she gave off was that as if her status in the society was all of
a sudden upgraded. Undoubtedly, the poet’s power of imagination enables him to
visualize an affluent and sophisticated British landlady belonging to the
so-called progressive and urban world on the other side.
Tension rises with the
explicit racial discrimination conveyed through the question---
“How
Dark?”……
The landlady’s effort in
seeking clarification in something quite irrelevant that is, his skin colour,
in the course of the conversation is emphasized. She repeated her question,
reinforcing the racist overtone in the English society.
The narrator is jolted
back into reality from his trance like state and he makes a frantic attempt to
ascertain the situation. The revelation comes with the repetition of the
question by the landlady with varying emphasis.
“ARE
YOU DARK? OR VERY LIGHT? You mean-like plain or milk chocolate?”
It was soul shattering to
the narrator that the landlady could so insensitive to his feelings. Fuming
with anger, the man decided to inflict similar humiliation in the racist woman
choosing a superior vocabulary and replying in an acutely sarcastic tone.
“West
African Sepia – and as afterthought, ‘down in my passport.”
He quickly forces her
into submission and exposes the ignorance of the landlady clearly illustrating
that beneath the lady’s glossy and lavish exterior, she was just a shallow
judgmental racist. Paying no attention to the landlady’s disrespect for him, he
took a firm control over the conversation defending the dignity and integrity
of his ethic identity form the ruthless onslaught of the landlady. He goes on
to describe the various colours one could see on him;
“Facially,
I am brunette, but, madam, you should see the rest of me.”
Unabashedly, he goes on
to state that the palms of his hands and the soles of his feet are peroxide
blonde and that friction by sitting down had turned his bottom – raven black.
With a slow but furious realization the lady began to set the receiver down.
‘sensing….’ the man rushed to ask sarcastically:
“Madam”,
I pleaded, “Wouldn’t you rather see for yourself?”
The quasi politeness of
the tone of the poet can hardly conceive the ultimate insult inflicted on the
land lady and shows how indignant the man was, also ending the poem with a
tremendous sense of humour apart from the obvious sarcasm.
“Telephone conversation”
is a favourite, both for its excellent use of rich language and the timeless
message it conveys, that is to avoid silent resignations to such policies of
the racist society and also that intellectual superiority is not determined by
racial colour.
-----
Courtesy: I$C English
No comments:
Post a Comment