Monday, September 25, 2017

How Should One Read A Book? – Virginia Woolf (Summary)

How Should One Read A Book? – Virginia Woolf

Adeline Virginia Woolf was an English writer who considered one of the foremost modernists of the twentieth century, and a pioneer in the use of stream of consciousness as a narrative device.

In the essay, “How Should One Read a Book?”  from the pen of Virginia Woolf talks about how she views reading a book as personal experience for everyone. She views reading is a thing of liberty and freedom, where you can escape and not be bothered by what everyone else thinks. It is fact that Woolf’s feelings about reading influenced her writings. She wrote whatever she wanted and never censored her thoughts. She also wants to change the way we see certain literature. We see fiction as mere amusement, poetry as false and biographies are flattering. She describes poetry and biography extensively and uses examples from other writers.  This reading of a book is teaching us, what Woolf thinks, is the proper way to read a book. She believes that even if we read something a hundred times we will never be able to truly criticize or understand it, because literature is so deep and profound.

In the first paragraph Woolf says, “the only advice indeed, that one person can give another about reading is to take no advice, to follow your own instincts, to use your own reason, to come to your own conclusions.” Similarly, she is trying to say that no one views and imagines a book in the same way. The readers do not even imagine a book the way, how the writer intended to communicate them. Therefore, it may be in a way the readers are also the writers since they come up with their own conclusions. It is like when a book becomes a movie: the director shows the way that he viewed the book; he may even change certain events and characters for the movie. The writer may argue against this but they can do nothing about it, since the director had made it his own. Woolf also argues that one cannot truly say that one book is better than other is. “Romeo and Juliet” may be viewed as one of the greatest books of all times, but to whom? All we see it a certain way and Shakespeare certainly is not with us to discuss and decide which book is better than the other.

It is ironical that Woolf is trying to say that we should not be told how to read a book since it takes away our freedom, but later on she is telling us how we should read a book. She tells us not to dictate the author but to try to become him. She is convincing the reader that he/she should not ask, “Why would the character do that? I would have made them do so and so.” The reader should respect the author’s choice and try to understand why they wrote that. She also thinks that it takes away from us truly enjoying the book. She thinks that when we read, we are in a different world, and when we read, we should not let things from our present world influence the way we are seeking in the book. It also seems like Woolf is questioning the intelligence of the readers. She seems to believe that one must be an intellectual and college-educated person in order to appreciate a book.

At the conclusion of the essay, it shows how much Virginia Woolf loved and valued reading. She looks at it as a kind of holy thing that will get you into Heaven. She thinks that the people with books under their arms will get into Heaven before the lawyers and the statesmen. She thinks that we not only read for pleasure but also it is a good thing to do.   

----0000---




3 comments:

  1. chutiye likha he kyu hai jab koi padh he nhi rah to

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't criticize someone that is the theme of chapter, which applies universally.

      Delete
    2. People like you are failure about beauties of life and literature... Such disregard for a very good attempt reflects a demeaning personality of yours. You perhaps come from a very low mindset....

      Delete

ODYSSEUS - Summary

  ODYSSEUS   Summary    Odysseus, lord of the isle of Ithaca, has been missing from his kingdom for twenty years. The first ten had been spe...